Ben Schmidt wrote:
> math('sqrt',argument)
> math('exp',exponent[,base=e])
> math('log',argument[,base=e])
> math('sin',argument[,degrees (bool)=0])
> math('cos',argument[,degrees (bool)=0])
> math('tan',argument[,degrees (bool)=0])
> math('atan',argument[,degrees (bool)=0])Considering the functions, not the syntax to call them, I would have to suggest that it would be better to use Python-in-Vim for this sort of thing (and get complex numbers as well, plus heaps more). For example: http://vim.wikia.com/wiki/Scientific_calculator Someone might like to consider how moving Vim float variables into Python, and getting float results back, works. It would be a pointless waste of development time to do much more with floats in Vim, IMHO. > Are floats or doubles being used? They are definitely being > displayed with float, not double, precision at present. Vim's float code is using doubles. I haven't done anything serious with floats for years, but my vague recollection is that you would have to use something like printf('%.20f',myfloat) to see lots of precision (i.e. I think what you are seeing in Vim is just standard behaviour). John --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
