Bram Moolenaar wrote: > Chris Sutcliffe wrote: >> There is a small issue with this patch: >> >>> *** ../vim-7.1.327/src/os_unix.c Fri Jun 20 11:58:27 2008 >>> --- src/os_unix.c Sat Jun 21 13:06:45 2008 >>> *************** >>> *** 2278,2283 **** >>> --- 2278,2287 ---- >>> char_u olddir[MAXPATHL]; >>> char_u *p; >>> int retval = OK; >>> + #ifdef __CYGWIN__ >>> + char_u posix_fname[MAX_PATH]; >>> + #endif >>> + >> MAX_PATH is undeclared when I attempted to compile this with Cygwin. >> I changed it to MAXPATHL and it works fine. > > So Cygwin doesn't follow its own documentation? So much for trusting > that.
Yeah, that's very poor form. Unless it's a Cygwin documentation vs. implementation version issue, but that hardly seems likely. Ben. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
