On 2008-06-24, Ben Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > Chris Sutcliffe wrote: > >> There is a small issue with this patch: > >> > >>> *** ../vim-7.1.327/src/os_unix.c Fri Jun 20 11:58:27 2008 > >>> --- src/os_unix.c Sat Jun 21 13:06:45 2008 > >>> *************** > >>> *** 2278,2283 **** > >>> --- 2278,2287 ---- > >>> char_u olddir[MAXPATHL]; > >>> char_u *p; > >>> int retval = OK; > >>> + #ifdef __CYGWIN__ > >>> + char_u posix_fname[MAX_PATH]; > >>> + #endif > >>> + > >> MAX_PATH is undeclared when I attempted to compile this with Cygwin. > >> I changed it to MAXPATHL and it works fine. > > > > So Cygwin doesn't follow its own documentation? So much for trusting > > that. > > Yeah, that's very poor form. > > Unless it's a Cygwin documentation vs. implementation version issue, but > that hardly seems likely.
What documentation are you referring to? Regards, Gary --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
