Christian MICHON, 02.07.2008: > it took a while, but it's finally available...
That's great! > Keep in mind that: > - this is not upstream of course With the only difference that it's inofficial, right? > - each release has its own branch (master=7.1) > - this will not include the betas, only pristine/official releases and > the usual set of patches from Bram What speaks against a branch for 7.2a? > Here's the nice bits: > - Git users should be able to use this easily to rebase partially > bitrotted patches > - we should be able to maintain specific patches using branches Do you have the recently started "Vim Patches Project" discussion in mind? If this tree would be kept up-to-date to some extent, I'd like use it in favor of the subversion access. But of course there should be a branch for the head of development (7.2a). Markus --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
