On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 2:12 AM, Markus Heidelberg
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Keep in mind that:
>> - this is not upstream of course
>
> With the only difference that it's inofficial, right?

exactly! the purpose is to keep an updated version, as accurate as
cvs/svn/tarballs+patches with correct dates and ownership.

>
>> - each release has its own branch (master=7.1)
>> - this will not include the betas, only pristine/official releases and
>> the usual set of patches from Bram
>
> What speaks against a branch for 7.2a?

The purpose was for released versions if possible. I guess I can
create (soon) a branch for 7.2a. I'll see if I get good internet
access in the next 4 weeks or not (holidays).

>
>> Here's the nice bits:
>> - Git users should be able to use this easily to rebase partially
>> bitrotted patches
>> - we should be able to maintain specific patches using branches
>
> Do you have the recently started "Vim Patches Project" discussion in mind?

yes, that was my point. you could keep this "vim patches project" in
sync as a branch and update it accordingly.

>
> If this tree would be kept up-to-date to some extent, I'd like use it in favor
> of the subversion access. But of course there should be a branch for the head
> of development (7.2a).

I'll keep it up to date (maybe not for the next 4 weeks at least).
I'll try to get this 7.2a branch started soon. (this is git: I should
be able to do it on the plane :-))

-- 
Christian
--
http://detaolb.sourceforge.net/, a linux distribution for Qemu with Git inside !

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Raspunde prin e-mail lui