Richard Hartmann, 08.11.2008: > > On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 00:07, Markus Heidelberg > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > But because there was not a single response to my mail from 13.10.2008, I > > came > > to the conclusion that nobody was interested in this. That was quite > > disappointing, especially because several threads on this list let me > > believe > > the opposite. > > Personally, I don't have enough free time to really get into testing the > various > feature sets. I will try to set apart some time to build the various > Vim versions > and use them in my daily work, though.
I didn't think on testing, but rather on using. I use the master branch with all features included, without using every feature. I wanted to do something instead of only talking about it and started it quite simple as a bare repository. When it would be well received, we could of course do more out of it. > One thing that might lead to a _lot_ more exposure would be stealing the > build tools from the various distributions to provide pre-built .deb > etc files. If > you could automate this, it would not be much work for you and I am pretty > certain a lot more people would use it. I don't have any objections to it, though I initially thought it's more interesting for people compiling their own Vim. When creating such packages, we'd have to deal with naming conflicts - either allow coexistence and change the installation path and executable names or you can't install it side by side with the official Vim. Markus --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
