> This code looks OK to me. Maybe it's a bug in gcc or maybe this > construction is just not portable. I suspect it's a bug in gcc but > I'm not 100% sure.
Isn't it better to file this as a bug with gcc? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
