On Nov 15, 5:25 pm, Nico Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This code looks OK to me. Maybe it's a bug in gcc or maybe this > > construction is just not portable. I suspect it's a bug in gcc but > > I'm not 100% sure. > > Isn't it better to file this as a bug with gcc?
Agreed. I just opened a gcc bug in bugzilla, and linked to this discussion. See: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38136 I'll try to see if it's possible to simplify the gcc bug to a simpler test case. -- Dominique --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
