björn, 19.11.2008: > > 2008/11/19 Jason Foreman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 1:03 PM, Jason Foreman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> This weekend I can do a trial run of rebasing MacVim onto > >> vim_extended. If I get it working, I will make the result available > >> > > I've pushed the resulting branch into a fork of vim_extended at > > http://repo.or.cz/w/MacVim_ext.git/ > > > > If anyone is interested please have a look. I don't expect this to be > > the final result, as there is no doubt something I did wrong or could > > do better. One thing that I do not like is that the commit times for > > all the MacVim commits show as when I performed the rebase. They also > > show me as the committer (though they retain the correct author > > name/date). There is probably some other stuff that can be done > > better, and I'm more than happy to run through the process again to > > get the details correct. > > I agree that it would be much nicer if the commit times were > right...it would be very confusing for me if I ever had to look for > some commit that I knew I made X months ago.
Do you really need your old commit dates? You have to distinguish between "author" and "commit" date and name. Normally the author date is what you see when searching the history. Oh, I just noticed that gitweb shows the commit date in the shortlog. I admit, that's a bit odd. Markus --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
