Hello Markus, On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 01:10:20AM +0100, Markus Heidelberg wrote: > > Richard Hartmann, 07.12.2008: > > Hi all, > > > > building vim_extended with the code checker patch fails: > > > > > > % git checkout -b local/code_checking origin/vim > > % git merge origin/code_checking > > % ./configure --with-features=huge --enable-multibyte --enable-cscope \ > > --enable-perlinterp --enable-pythoninterp --enable-rubyinterp \ > > --prefix=/usr/local/vim_extended > > % make > > It doesn't fail for me with exactly this proceeding. > > > code_check.c:315: error: 'gui' undeclared (first use in this function) > > code_check.c:364: error: 'gui' undeclared (first use in this function) > > FEAT_GUI is not defined, so gui.h is not included and gui_T gui is > unknown. Some #ifdef FEAT_GUI are required. Doesn't configure find GTK > or so? See vim.h line 100. > Thanks for pointing out the problem. The fix seems to be easy, I will try to make it tonight (or sometime tomorrow).
> Birgi, is the codecheck project still active? There are no new > commits/patches on the Google Code project site since your announcement > on the list. > Yes, it is active, but unfortunately I am having a very hard time to work on it during the semester. In 10 days I will have a break for a couple of weeks. During that time I am planning to add a few more things. Regards, > > Markus, please put the attached file into the git repo. > > In which branch, master? > > I already have plans to split the readme part on the gitweb interface > into two: one for the most simple use of just the master branch as > already done and another for creation of an own branch merging various > feature branches as you did in the attached file. > > But I'd like to keep it short, forgoing all the things that aren't > special for vim_extended like details in configuring Vim and setting up > git. There is already enough documentation out there, a Vim novice won't > use vim_extended anyway, a git novice though. > > Wednesday is my last working day, then I'll have more time even though > I've so many plans. > > I wonder if it is better to activate the features by default. The Lua > interface for example. I think it is, nobody wants to merge the lua > branch for not using it, do you agree? > > I also think it would be better to patch src/auto/configure, then "make > -C src autoconf" wouldn't be necessary anymore. This would also be the > case, when the patch was integrated into mainline. > > Markus > > > > -- Birgi --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
