On Dec 18, 7:01 am, Markus Heidelberg <[email protected]>
wrote:
> > I think that's the decisive argument. Something prettier might be found
> > though; maybe a squared plus or minus sign &x229E; &x229F; or circled
> > &x2295; &x2296; (plus for a closed fold that can be opened; minus for an
> > open fold that can be closed). This would look more similar to what is
> > used in other software for stuff that can be folded in or out.
>
> Given that anything else in the HTML output (also the 'number' option)
> pretty much reflects the appearance of Vim's window, maybe the
> foldcolumn should also look the same as in Vim?
>
That's what I was thinking. However, it would certainly be easier to
code (and potentially to interact with) if the foldcolumn width would
just grow to accommodate the highest fold level. What do people
think...should 'foldcolumn' be used for the width of the fold column,
complete with a duplication of Vim's foldcolumn text, or should it
just grow as needed?
> When typing ^Vu and the codes above in terminal Vim, I always get these
> squares, i.e. the characters cannot be displayed, in vim -g it works. Is
> this a font issue?
> Also, Konqueror displays the squares, but Firefox and Opera get it
> right.
>
I think we should try to create a page that doesn't depend on the font
being used (beyond the fact that it should be fixed-width, of course).
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
