On 11/04/09 04:16, Matt Wozniski wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 6:43 PM, Tony Mechelynck wrote:
>>
>> Couldn't you run "test" just once? Maybe something more or less like
>>
>> if test -n "$x_includes" -a "$x_includes" != "NONE"
>>
>> Just my sense of aesthetics, I'm not on a Mac.
>
> Usually, yes - but lore tells of shells where "test" isn't POSIX
> compatible, where "-a" and "-o" don't behave predictably but "&&" and
> "||" do...
>
> *shrug*
>
> ~Matt
Hm. What about the shells available on the Mac, and in particular on Mac
OS X ?
Best regards,
Tony.
--
Then here's to the City of Boston,
The town of the cries and the groans.
Where the Cabots can't see the Kabotschniks,
And the Lowells won't speak to the Cohns.
-- Franklin Pierce Adams
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
