Tony Mechelynck <[email protected]> wrote:
> I haven't verified everything, but shouldn't it be
>> + {0x0624, 0xfe85, 0, 0, 0xfe85}, /* a_WAW_HAMZA */
> + {0x0624, 0xfe85, 0, 0, 0xfe86}, /* a_WAW_HAMZA */
>
> (i.e., waw-hamza final U+FE86 different from isolated U+FE85) ?
Good catch. Thanks.
Ali
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
