Ali Gholami Rudi wrote:
> Tony Mechelynck <[email protected]> wrote: > > I haven't verified everything, but shouldn't it be > >> + {0x0624, 0xfe85, 0, 0, 0xfe85}, /* a_WAW_HAMZA */ > > + {0x0624, 0xfe85, 0, 0, 0xfe86}, /* a_WAW_HAMZA */ > > > > (i.e., waw-hamza final U+FE86 different from isolated U+FE85) ? > > Good catch. Thanks. So, mistakes are possible. Can we rely on Tony to find them or do we need a test? -- Often you're less important than your furniture. If you think about it, you can get fired but your furniture stays behind, gainfully employed at the company that didn't need _you_ anymore. (Scott Adams - The Dilbert principle) /// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\ /// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\ \\\ download, build and distribute -- http://www.A-A-P.org /// \\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org /// --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
