> > I don't know about completion in / ? buffers etiher so it I'd say it > doesn't work. Again patching it and getting in the patch will take time. > (I'd rather see someone spend the time making vim threadsafe by adding > some locking .. :-) >
thread safe... I did not dear to mention it :) I feel like it being the time of telling the truth :) I am afraid that it would drive to dead lock... Unfortunatelly the code is not organized for thread safety (to introduce locking) in my opinion grds, mobi phil being mobile, but including technology http://mobiphil.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
