On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 00:05, Tony Mechelynck<antoine.mechely...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 15/07/09 14:43, mobi phil wrote: >> Look, I think I am enough mature and have years of IT, I know how to >> attack a problem. Considering that you seem to have posted your first message to this list about one week ago, yes, that seems about right. >> I have these ideas for years now, I wanted to be sure >> that they are useful. And now I am convinced that they are useful. What >> you say depends on what does it mean "vim way". You mean vim way of >> vim 3.7 or vim way of 10.11? There is a difference. I think you got the >> point. > and come back 5 years from now (or somesuch - when Bram > will be releasing _his_ Vim 11.0) to put Bram's nose in his shit by > showing thim that he had it all wrong and how vim 11 REALLY should behave. Jesus, that’s harsh. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
