> > Oh, so you know better what Vim release 11 should include? Well, go > ahead, take the sources (they're there for anyone to look at) or start > from scratch, and come back 5 years from now (or somesuch - when Bram > will be releasing _his_ Vim 11.0) to put Bram's nose in his shit by > showing thim that he had it all wrong and how vim 11 REALLY should behave. >
I am afraid you misunderstood. I was just asking what do you min vim way. During version 5 of course vim way did not mean features that are now included in vim7. So if sthg. like smartsearch will be included in version 11, you would consider it very "vim way", or am I wrong? Is syntax highliglighting "vim way" for sure not in version 1 and so on.. rgrds, mobi phil being mobile, but including technology http://mobiphil.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
