On Sunday 16 May 2010 11:09:15 am Tony Mechelynck wrote:
> hashes are carried over (the short hash for Bram's vim73
> parent to my latest merge is listed as c6f1aa1e9f32 with the
> description "Add 'relativenumber' patch from Markus
> Heidelberg") and anyway they aren't taken over in the
> resulting executable.
they were for me
the difference i think is in the way you updated
my update script does
hg pull -u
hg update
mercurial then told me a merge might be a good idea, so i did one
the merge reminded me to commit, so i then did that
relative numbers are now, for me, a mainstream reality
dunno why you like that 'fetch' better, but for me the
pull/update work famously
sc
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php