Tony Mechelynck wrote: > Hello, I notice that no "patch numbers" are added to the 7.3a version.c. > That's OK for me except that it may make it harder in the future to > track exactly on which build some bug was seen. Mercurial relative > revisions are not a reliable reference: for instance on my local > repository there's one additional revision every time I "fetch" the > source (if there is a change in one or more of src/version.c, > src/Makefile, src/eval.c or src/feature.h): for instance my current > vim73 "head" is at local revision count 2193. I don't know if Mercurial > hashes are carried over (the short hash for Bram's vim73 parent to my > latest merge is listed as c6f1aa1e9f32 with the description "Add > 'relativenumber' patch from Markus Heidelberg") and anyway they aren't > taken over in the resulting executable.
There are no patch levels, this is work in progress. Once public beta testing starts I'll use patches as usual. -- hundred-and-one symptoms of being an internet addict: 50. The last girl you picked up was only a jpeg. /// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\ /// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\ \\\ download, build and distribute -- http://www.A-A-P.org /// \\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org /// -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
