Tony Mechelynck wrote: > OTOH, I believe that CSApprox does the job well, with no appreciable delay, > and I don't feel the necessity of patching the C code.
Hi Tony I also use CSApprox which I find very nice. I measured how long it takes for vim to start with & without CSApprox on my machine (without using the snapshotted scheme feature of CSApprox): When using CSApprox.vim: $ time vim -c q real 0m0.496s user 0m0.468s sys 0m0.020s When not using CSApprox.vim: $ time vim -c q real 0m0.221s user 0m0.196s sys 0m0.012s So on my machine, using CSApprox.vim adds ~ 275 ms which is acceptable but noticeable (it more than doubles startup time). I'm using Vim-7.3a huge with this colorscheme: http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=2198 This is the timing using --startuptime (measuring several times) which shows that sourcing CSApprox.vim takes ~ 270 ms (second column): $ vim --startuptime with-csaaprox.txt -c q $ grep CSApprox with-csaaprox.txt 401.332 272.682 262.586: sourcing /home/pel/.vim/plugin/CSApprox.vim 398.207 269.501 259.428: sourcing /home/pel/.vim/plugin/CSApprox.vim 392.784 262.959 253.058: sourcing /home/pel/.vim/plugin/CSApprox.vim 389.716 262.984 253.074: sourcing /home/pel/.vim/plugin/CSApprox.vim 400.432 267.164 257.251: sourcing /home/pel/.vim/plugin/CSApprox.vim Regards -- Dominique -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
