On 15/07/10 07:44, Dominique Pellé wrote:
Tony Mechelynck wrote:
OTOH, I believe that CSApprox does the job well, with no appreciable delay,
and I don't feel the necessity of patching the C code.
Hi Tony
I also use CSApprox which I find very nice. I measured how long it
takes for vim to start with& without CSApprox on my machine (without
using the snapshotted scheme feature of CSApprox):
When using CSApprox.vim:
$ time vim -c q
real 0m0.496s
user 0m0.468s
sys 0m0.020s
When not using CSApprox.vim:
$ time vim -c q
real 0m0.221s
user 0m0.196s
sys 0m0.012s
So on my machine, using CSApprox.vim adds ~ 275 ms which is acceptable
but noticeable (it more than doubles startup time). I'm using Vim-7.3a
huge with this colorscheme:
You're a fast-reacting guy. Changing from a quarter of a second to half
a second is not something I notice. Especially now that I use a
hand-coded session file whose last line is "sleep 3 | intro" :-)
http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=2198
This is the timing using --startuptime (measuring several times)
which shows that sourcing CSApprox.vim takes ~ 270 ms (second column):
$ vim --startuptime with-csaaprox.txt -c q
$ grep CSApprox with-csaaprox.txt
401.332 272.682 262.586: sourcing /home/pel/.vim/plugin/CSApprox.vim
398.207 269.501 259.428: sourcing /home/pel/.vim/plugin/CSApprox.vim
392.784 262.959 253.058: sourcing /home/pel/.vim/plugin/CSApprox.vim
389.716 262.984 253.074: sourcing /home/pel/.vim/plugin/CSApprox.vim
400.432 267.164 257.251: sourcing /home/pel/.vim/plugin/CSApprox.vim
Regards
-- Dominique
Best regards,
Tony.
--
By trying, we can easily learn to endure adversity -- another man's, I
mean.
-- Mark Twain
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
