On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Bram Moolenaar <[email protected]> wrote: > > Jakson Aquino wrote: > >> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Bram Moolenaar <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Unfortunately, when I run Aap, applying the diff fails. It looks like >> > the diff was made for another pt_PT.aff file. The one that was >> > downloaded looks like this: >> > >> > >> > SET UTF-8 >> > LANG pt_PT >> > TRY aerisontcdmlupvgbfzáhçqjíxãóéêâúõACMPSBTELGRIFVDkHJONôywUKXZWQÁYÍÉàÓèÂÚ >> > KEY qwertyuiop|asdfghjkl|zxcvbnm >> > WORDCHARS - >> > >> > >> > The diff expects: >> > >> > SET ISO8859-1 >> > - TRY >> > aerisontcdmlupvgbfzáhçqjíxãóéêâúõACMPSBTELGRIFVDkHJONôywUKXZWQÁYÍÉàÓèÂÚ >> > >> > >> > Also, the .aff file has lots of trailing text. Are we using the same >> > download? >> > I have made an attempt in fixing this. Please check the files on the >> > ftp server: ftp://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/runtime/spell/pt/ >> > >> > Also check spell suggestions with the generated .spl file. >> > >> >> It seems that everything is ok now. Thank you very much for fixing it! >> >> I deleted all files from my local spell/pt directory and restored them >> with "hg updated -C". I compared the files generated by "hg update -C" >> with the ones in the ftp server and they have the same md5sums. Then, >> I generated and copied the pt.utf-8.spl and pt.latin1.spl files to >> ~/.vim/spell. European and Brazilian spell check seems to be correct >> and up to date and the spell suggestions are good. >> >> However, the pt.utf-8.spl from the ftp server seems to be outdated... >> Did you do "aap clean" before generating it? > > No, I didn't update the pt_BR files. I'll do that now. Hmm, I see a > few warnings...
I see some duplicate warnings... fixdup.vim can delete 122 duplicates, but about 1600 would remain. The lines weren't duplicates in the original pt_PT.dic because each root entry---even though carrying the same suffixes---had a different grammatical category. They became duplicates after the deletion of the grammatical information. Most of the remaining duplicates can be deleted with: :2,$ sort u But about 200 duplicated roots would still remain because they have different suffixes. Example: advindo/L advindo/fp I guess that, if there is no problem in the .dic being sorted, we can use ":2,$ sort u" to delete the real duplicates, but I guess that it's better to let the remaining 200 duplicates in the file. So, what to do? Best regards, Jakson -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
