Doing 1000@@ is like executing the result of repeat(@@, 1000), right?
There are two problems with this: With great count it consumes much memory. Re: Supporting more key modifiers http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/vimdev/message/60564 It is surprising that changing the register during execution has no effect. calling macros single time and multiple times - what's difference? http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/vim/message/121363 So, what about executing 1000@@ as @@999@@ (where in turn 999@@ is executed as @@998@@ and so on ... and 2@@ as @@1@@ and 1@@ as @@ )? -- Andy -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
