Hello John,
Excerpt from John Beckett: > Dominique Pellé wrote: >> Yes. Maintainers were in CC of the emails. But perhaps I >> should write to the maintainers only to avoid sending too many >> emails to vim_dev (still more of those simple patches to >> come...) > > There is no good way to do this except to email the maintainers > only ... wait, try again ... repeat. If get a positive response, > good. Otherwise, find a volunteer to take over maintenance! > > That's too much work for what you are doing, but Bram cannot > take patches like these because the maintainer might later send > an update to Bram, but the maintainer failed to receive, or > failed to process, your email. So the later update could easily > remove your patch. That is exactlx what i think about the current practice, too. Really i think instead of that single-point-of-failure modell of maintenance we should move the a team maintenance of runtimefiles. Unless that changes it is nearly impossible to get archive wide features/policies applied. > > John > -- Regards, Thilo 4096R/0xC70B1A8F 721B 1BA0 095C 1ABA 3FC6 7C18 89A4 A2A0 C70B 1A8F -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
