Hello Bram,
Excerpt from Bram Moolenaar: -- <snip> -- >> No objection here but a question. There are allready some more email adresses >> that bounced. >> I am in favour of changing the email address to vim-dev. The current >> noted email address is broken anyway and therefore useless. If those >> maintainers ever should come back we can hand them those files over >> again. > > I would propose to make changes like this after a version control system > has been setup for runtime file maintainers. That way it's easier to > track changes and the reason why they were made. I would expect a > change to the file with a comment that mentions that the email bounced. Agreed. We defer such changes until we have the infrastructure to handle them right. > I don't want to do these commits for every little change, it takes too > much of my time. I don't know what the overhead is for these commits. > If not too much I could pull the changes into the release version, > instead of applying the diff and making a commit for lots of changes > at once. > > Note that it's still possible that some email bounces once but works the > next day. Will keep this notated. -- Regards, Thilo 4096R/0xC70B1A8F 721B 1BA0 095C 1ABA 3FC6 7C18 89A4 A2A0 C70B 1A8F -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
