Lech Lorens wrote: > On 13-Apr-2013 Bram Moolenaar <b...@moolenaar.net> wrote: > > Thanks. Thus only when ~/.vimrc does not exist then ~/.vim/vimrc will > > be used. That should work for places where a new Vim is installed. For > > older Vim versions one would have to create a ~/.vimrc file that sources > > ~/.vim/vimrc. > > Do we want to change the priority? I meant not to confuse people if by > any chance they have both ~/.vimrc and ~/.vim/vimrc.
In my opinion, when a user sees a ~/.vimrc he expects it to be used and would be very surprised when it is skipped. That is both for existing Vim users and any generic Unix user. Far fewer people would know about the possibility for a ~/.vim/vimrc to exist. -- hundred-and-one symptoms of being an internet addict: 171. You invent another person and chat with yourself in empty chat rooms. /// Bram Moolenaar -- b...@moolenaar.net -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\ /// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\ \\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org /// \\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org /// -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
