Excerpts from Bram Moolenaar's message of Sun Apr 28 15:07:32 +0200 2013: > So we would require at least Python 2.3, right? > It was released in 2003, ten years ago. > I think that would be OK, unless there is a system that is stuck with > Python 2.2. Even then people could continue using older Vim versions. Having nice python support should be a higher priority. Because scripting support differing from VimL may have an positive effect on Vim's future IMHO.
Marc Weber -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
