> So we would require at least Python 2.3, right? > It was released in 2003, ten years ago. > I think that would be OK, unless there is a system that is stuck with > Python 2.2.
I already made a patch to make it work on python-2.2 (not pushed currently). Test passes not completely†, but they indicate that python-2.2 is usable. I have not checked python versions other then 2.2‡ and (2.7 + 3.2). † problem is with settrace test and with my vim.options; latter is working fine, but old python uses 0 in place of False. There are also strange errors about negative (-1) refcount at DESTRUCTOR_FINISH calls for some WindowDestructor and ListDestructor, I do not know why. ‡ no dynamic python and no python3 as I don’t know how to force vim load needed library; while LD_LIBRARY_PATH works fine for ld.so -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
