> Thanks for your remarks. > > Not including some patches may cause merge conflicts for what follows. > It might be easier to just include them in sequence.
> … > Perhaps someone can try out what happens when not including the 1/? and > 15/? patches? Patches suggested for exclusion not only change DICTKEY_*. > ZyX - perhaps you can make a sequence of "fixed" patches? I suppose > that's not so easy, once committed you need another commit to fix > something. Sequence of fixed patches was pushed here: https://bitbucket.org/ZyX_I/vim, branch python-extended-3-fixed. Sorry, but I do not have much time now to test the whole resulting series; only checked that hg diff -r python-extended-3-fixed -r python-extended-3 src/if_py* src/testdir/test8[67]* src/eval.c src/proto/eval.pro has no output (`hg diff` without filenames shows differences from patches 1013 till 1032 inclusive: fixed variant was rebased as well). -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
