Charles Peacech wrote:
> I have posted this a long time ago. The current guard for syntax files
>
> if !exists("main_syntax")
> if version < 600
> syntax clear
> elseif exists("b:current_syntax")
> finish
> endif
> let main_syntax = '...'
> endif
>
> is incomplete, becuase it does not guard against included files.
>
> How about adding
>
> if !exists("main_syntax")
> if version < 600
> syntax clear
> elseif exists("b:current_syntax")
> finish
> endif
> let main_syntax = '...'
> else
> if has_key("syntax_includes")
> finish
> else
> let syntax_includes['...'] = 1
> endif
> endif
>
> So the runtime syntax does not executed again if the user syntax have
> been included when using syn include?
Is there any syntax where we run into this problem?
Just skipping probably won't work anyway. Suppose you have this:
syntax A includes syntax B and C in specific regions.
Syntax B includes syntax C in specific regions.
Now syntax C would get loaded twice, but used in two different places.
If you would skip loading it in syntax B, then highlighting C inside B
stops working.
Solving this is complicated, thus let's only work on it when the problem
actually exists.
--
"How is your new girlfriend?"
"90-60-90 man!"
"What, pale purple?"
/// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\
/// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org ///
\\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org ///
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
