On Sunday, June 2, 2013 2:44:20 PM UTC-5, MarcWeber wrote: > How to continue? > > > > Submit ideas here: > > http://vim-wiki.mawercer.de/wiki/vim74/devs-workflows.html > > > > mercurial lovers speak up and tell why you'd prefer keep using > > mercurial for exchanging patches. (I'm not talking about changing the > > official repository. I'm only talking about preparing patches) > > > > I'd like to document whatever the result will be in about 2 weeks and > > make it official if nobody objects. > > > > This will not be a "you must follow this" - it will just be a > > recommendation which we document officially. >
I don't know whether it's common, but mailing "bundles" around might be better than patches. You can actually pull from a bundle as a source, so that not just the changes but the parent they are based off of is in there. Then Bram could rebase and collapse changesets if he wanted to, or just merge. It's not as nice as a pull request, but pretty close, and it can be done by email without Bram's worry about what "now" means because the source is attached to email. -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
