On Monday, June 3, 2013 7:21:04 AM UTC-5, Josh wrote: > On Jun 3, 2013, at 6:25 AM, LCD 47 <[email protected]> wrote: > > (1) Mercurial and Git are virtually identical to one another in terms of > > features. There are, of course, differences, but they are largely > > irrelevant to this discussion. > > I wouldn't say they're completely irrelevant to this discussion. If we're > discussing a shift in how development works, discussing a new dcvs might be a > good idea too. +1 to git >
Mercurial has an extension (hg-git) that allows it to push-pull git repositories as well as native Hg repositories. Git probably has something similar. Anybody who wants to use Git can. But I think moving the official repository to a new DVCS because some developers like it better, this soon after adopting Mercurial, would be silly at best. -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
