Ingo Karkat wrote: > I've noticed a regression: > > :s/.*/\="foo\nbar"/ > > This correctly replaces the current line with two lines containing "foo" > and "bar", respectively. Now add the confirm flag, and accept the > replacement: > > :s/.*/\="foo\nbar"/c > > This replaces the current line with a single line containing "foo^@bar" > (where ^@ is <Nul>). This is inconsistent and unexpected. Replacing with > \r instead works (with and without the flag), and can be used as a > workaround. > > Using the attached scriptlet, I've bisected this to the following patch: > > ,----[ bad change ]---- > | 7.3.225 "\n" in a substitute() inside ":s" not handled correctly > `---- > > The problem therefore can be seen in this and all following Vim > versions, verified up to the latest 7.4.258. (I've used a HUGE build on > both Windows/x64 and Linux/x64.)
I cannot reproduce this problem. -- >From "know your smileys": :----} You lie like Pinocchio /// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\ /// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\ \\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org /// \\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org /// -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
