On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 10:28 AM, Bram Moolenaar <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Ingo Karkat wrote: > > > I've noticed a regression: > > > > :s/.*/\="foo\nbar"/ > > > > This correctly replaces the current line with two lines containing "foo" > > and "bar", respectively. Now add the confirm flag, and accept the > > replacement: > > > > :s/.*/\="foo\nbar"/c > > > > This replaces the current line with a single line containing "foo^@bar" > > (where ^@ is <Nul>). This is inconsistent and unexpected. Replacing with > > \r instead works (with and without the flag), and can be used as a > > workaround. > > > > Using the attached scriptlet, I've bisected this to the following patch: > > > > ,----[ bad change ]---- > > | 7.3.225 "\n" in a substitute() inside ":s" not handled correctly > > `---- > > > > The problem therefore can be seen in this and all following Vim > > versions, verified up to the latest 7.4.258. (I've used a HUGE build on > > both Windows/x64 and Linux/x64.) > > I cannot reproduce this problem. > I can't reproduce it either, on Mac OSX. -Manny -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
