On Wednesday, February 4, 2015 at 5:44:21 AM UTC-6, Yukihiro Nakadaira wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 7:11 AM, Bram Moolenaar <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> Patch 7.4.618 (after 7.4.609)
> 
> Problem:    luaV_setref() is missing a return statement. (Ozaki Kiichi)
> 
> Solution:   Put the return statement back.
> 
> Files:      src/if_lua.c
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> *** ../vim-7.4.617/src/if_lua.c 2015-02-03 12:55:11.136179596 +0100
> 
> --- src/if_lua.c        2015-02-03 23:07:59.892636921 +0100
> 
> ***************
> 
> *** 1547,1552 ****
> 
> --- 1547,1553 ----
> 
>         abort = set_ref_in_item(&tv, copyID, NULL, NULL);
> 
>       }
> 
>       lua_pushinteger(L, abort);
> 
> +     return 0;
> 
>   }
> 
> 
> Return value should be 1 which is number of results.
> http://www.lua.org/manual/5.3/manual.html#lua_CFunction 
> 

Thanks, I don't know why I left that out. It's even in the example code I was 
working from: https://groups.google.com/d/topic/vim_dev/RzHGXmVewvc/discussion

-- 
-- 
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Raspunde prin e-mail lui