> Considering that resetting the listchars to its default does get you a space, we need to fix the initial value. I'll make a patch (it's easy, I'll leave the difficult stuff to you :-).
I am wondering why &listchars is taken into account when &list is *not* set. I do not work without &list, so never mentioned that, but I consider this a bug. It is inconsistent than every value in &listchars is ignored when &list is unset, except for conceal:. 2015-02-17 21:07 GMT+03:00 Christian Brabandt <[email protected]>: > On Di, 17 Feb 2015, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > > Considering that resetting the listchars to its default does get you a > > space, we need to fix the initial value. I'll make a patch > > Thanks. That makes my next patch easier. > > > (it's easy, I'll leave the difficult stuff to you :-). > > That's fine. As long as you do not mess up the easy stuff ;) > > Best, > Christian > -- > > -- > -- > You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. > Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. > For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "vim_dev" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
