Nikolay Pavlov wrote:
> > Considering that resetting the listchars to its default does get you a
> > space, we need to fix the initial value. I'll make a patch (it's easy,
> > I'll leave the difficult stuff to you :-).
>
> I am wondering why &listchars is taken into account when &list is *not*
> set. I do not work without &list, so never mentioned that, but I consider
> this a bug. It is inconsistent than every value in &listchars is ignored
> when &list is unset, except for conceal:.
Well, one can look at concealing as another kind of list mode.
Anyway, changing it now will cause trouble.
--
hundred-and-one symptoms of being an internet addict:
247. You use www.switchboard.com instead of dialing 411 and 555-12-12
for directory assistance.
/// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\
/// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org ///
\\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org ///
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
