Bram- Just a quick comment, followed by a maintenance question: First:
Despite being a long time git and github user, I would still vote that you go with your personal preference by sticking with hg. I feel that much of the vim development cycle is built on your personal style of development, and keeping that going is much more important to me than a choice of VCS and web host. Also, as a (naturalised) Aussie, I feel some obligation to root for Atlassian/bitbucket :). But the serious question: How will this work for syntax maintainers? In the past, we just send patches to the maintainers, who would then pass them along to you. Should we now send pull requests directly to the repo, and the maintainer can just vertify that it works? -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
