On Sunday, November 22, 2015 at 8:12:46 PM UTC-5, Nikolai Aleksandrovich Pavlov wrote: > These do not look like incorrect entries. They look like they are using > unicode apostroph and used font does not have the necessary glyph. I would > say that entries with ’ (U+2019, RIGHT SINGLE QUOTATION MARK, is said to be > “preferred character to use for apostrophe”) are more correct then entries > with ' (U+0027, APOSTROPHE) which is ASCII symbol with usual “used for > everything, thus looks worse then more specialized symbols” problem. You may > verify by completing to this entry and using ga on offending symbol: this > action should show something like <’> 8217, Hex 2019, Octal 20031.
The OP's screenshot seems to show Vim 7.4.712 using the same font showing fewer entries. E.g., the former has just "contacts" and "contact's", the latter has those two plus "contact-upside-down-question-mark-s". So why are the later Vims showing more entries? -Manny -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
