Hirohito Higashi wrote:
> I was refactoring the 'backspace' option of implementation.
>
> The following patch was incomplete.
> (It's my first created and contributed patch! Four years ago...)
>
> Patch 7.3.354
> Problem: ":set backspace+=eol" doesn't work when 'backspace' has a
> backwards compatible value of 2.
> Solution: Convert the number to a string. (Hirohito Higashi)
> Files: src/option.c
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/vim_dev/F3uFnrdYO3g/discussion
>
>
> A new patch has unified 'p_bs' variable handling to a string. So,
> remove the numerical reference process.
I don't think this works, using:
:set bs=2
Still results in the "2" value.
When refactoring it's always good to first have a test, so we can check
if the behavior before and after is the same. There is some testing of
'bs' in test29, but not much.
--
Microsoft: "Windows NT 4.0 now has the same user-interface as Windows 95"
Windows 95: "Press CTRL-ALT-DEL to reboot"
Windows NT 4.0: "Press CTRL-ALT-DEL to login"
/// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\
/// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org ///
\\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org ///
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
