Ken Takata wrote: > 2016/1/25 Mon 8:13:42 UTC+9 Ken Takata wrote: > > Hi, > > > > 2016/1/22 Fri 21:00:16 UTC+9 Ken Takata wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > 2016/1/21 Thu 21:48:44 UTC+9 Ken Takata wrote: > > > > Hi mattn and all, > > > > > > > > I think that supporting 64-bit Number (even on 32-bit systems) is very > > > > useful. > > > > One of the best examples is getfsize() as mattn said. 32-bit Number is > > > > too > > > > small to represent a filesize nowadays. > > > > > > > > > > > > 2014/1/6 Mon 15:34:44 UTC+9 mattn wrote: > > > > > https://gist.github.com/mattn/8278843 > > > > > > > > > > This is in progress. > > > > > > > > I have updated mattn's patch: > > > > https://bitbucket.org/k_takata/vim-ktakata-mq/src/fd966d51f56b69e02d9ebb984355f692b73b2260/num64.patch?at=default&fileviewer=file-view-default > > > > > > > > Changes are: > > > > > > > > * Sync with the latest codebase. > > > > * VC9 or earlier doesn't have stdint.h, int64_t and uint64_t. > > > > Use __int64 for old Windows compilers. > > > > * Define FEAT_NUM64 in feature.h. > > > > (If someone doesn't like this feature, s/he can disable this by > > > > editing > > > > feature.h.) > > > > * Display +/-num64 in :version. > > > > * Add has('num64'). > > > > * Adjust the behaviour when dividing by 0. (:help expr-/) > > > > * Adjust the behaviour of float2nr(). > > > > > > > > I confirmed that getfsize() returned a right value even if the filesize > > > > was > > > > over 2 GiB. (My largefile patches are also needed.) > > > > I also confirmed that all existing tests passed. > > > > > > > > Of cause, more tests are needed, and documents should be updated. > > > > > > > > (See also: [patch] Always use long for vimscript Numbers > > > > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/vim_dev/Ju0DDCqeuMc/discussion ) > > > > > > I have updated the patch and divided it into two: > > > https://bitbucket.org/k_takata/vim-ktakata-mq/src/ec8fa710e76975724c30d0f84c02e1460e5bb705/num64.patch?at=default&fileviewer=file-view-default > > > https://bitbucket.org/k_takata/vim-ktakata-mq/src/ec8fa710e76975724c30d0f84c02e1460e5bb705/incdec64.patch?at=default&fileviewer=file-view-default > > > > > > If incdec64.patch is applied, incrementing/decrementing with <C-A>/<C-X> > > > uses > > > 64-bit integer on supported platforms. (Currently, 64-bit int is used on > > > 64-bit > > > Linux but not on 64-bit Windows.) > > > > I have updated the paches: > > https://bitbucket.org/k_takata/vim-ktakata-mq/src/d1b6fe7c1f38ffc8d7fda03fda31d0dec6a5cbd1/num64.patch?fileviewer=file-view-default > > https://bitbucket.org/k_takata/vim-ktakata-mq/src/d1b6fe7c1f38ffc8d7fda03fda31d0dec6a5cbd1/incdec64.patch?fileviewer=file-view-default > > > > Now, vim_snprintf() supports 64-bit formats (%lld, etc.). > > Here are the updated num64 patches for 7.4.1202 (including docs). > Also available on my bitbucket repository: > https://bitbucket.org/k_takata/vim-ktakata-mq/src
Thanks. I'm going to change the function declarations today, this probably means it's going to change again... After that everything will be better! -- hundred-and-one symptoms of being an internet addict: 84. Books in your bookcase bear the names Bongo, WinSock and Inside OLE /// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\ /// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\ \\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org /// \\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org /// -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
