frantisek holop wrote:
> Christian Brabandt, 08 Apr 2016 08:08:
>> I don't have any saying in that, but I guess what Bram wants is
>> something like this:
>>
>> if exists("c_bsd_types")
>> syn keyword cType u_int8_t u_int16_t u_int32_t u_int64_t
>> endif
>>
>> And then add an entry at runtime/doc/syntax.txt below *ft-c-syntax* and
>> document the variable.
> ah, i see. i am of course slightly biased in favor of
> having this cType's, but i think for non-bsd people
> this would be mostly a no-op so if the condition is
> desired, an opt-out ("c_no_bsd_types") might be nicer :}
>
For the vast majority, I agree that your new types would not have much
effect. However, its a big world, and there are bound to be people who
have ginned up their own (conflicting) types. I agree with Christian
that it should be an optional (c_bsd_types) inclusion.
Regards,
Chip Campbell
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
