Charles Campbell wrote:
> frantisek holop wrote:
> > Christian Brabandt, 08 Apr 2016 08:08:
> >> I don't have any saying in that, but I guess what Bram wants is
> >> something like this:
> >>
> >> if exists("c_bsd_types")
> >> syn keyword cType u_int8_t u_int16_t u_int32_t u_int64_t
> >> endif
> >>
> >> And then add an entry at runtime/doc/syntax.txt below *ft-c-syntax* and
> >> document the variable.
> > ah, i see. i am of course slightly biased in favor of
> > having this cType's, but i think for non-bsd people
> > this would be mostly a no-op so if the condition is
> > desired, an opt-out ("c_no_bsd_types") might be nicer :}
> >
> For the vast majority, I agree that your new types would not have much
> effect. However, its a big world, and there are bound to be people who
> have ginned up their own (conflicting) types. I agree with Christian
> that it should be an optional (c_bsd_types) inclusion.
Or we can include them by default and allow for them to be excluded when
a variable is set.
--
hundred-and-one symptoms of being an internet addict:
249. You've forgotten what the outside looks like.
/// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\
/// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org ///
\\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org ///
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
