Hi Axel!
On Do, 26 Mai 2016, Axel Bender wrote:
> Tracing the startup process, reading a MD file ("gvim -V readme.md") I
> noticed that two HTML files were sourced: my own one in %VIM\.vim\syntax,
> plus the original (unchanged) one in %VIM\syntax (rtp only contains the stems
> of these two paths).
> This is due to the "runtime!" (mind the exclamation mark) command in
> markdown.vim. Removing the "!" avoids the "error", so my posted suggestion
> was wrong.
> In fact, the error is a result of other files, e.g. vb.vim, css.vim, js.vim
> also being sourced by the original html.vim file (which btw. uses "syntax
> include" commands to source its dependent files).
>
> Therefore, the question stands: does it make any sense to use "runtime!"
> (instead of "syntax include") here, given the possibility that s.o. (like me)
> completely rewrites a bunch of syntax files (in his own, private path)? Is
> this common practice (which would implicate that I also would have to rewrite
> any other syntax file that possibly sources "my" files?
perhaps you should find out, why the group is undefined in your custom
html file? Where is the mentioned group defined and check in your custom
syntax file, if that group exists?
Best,
Christian
--
Soldaten sind keine Mörder - im Gegenteil!
-- Roman Herzog (Versprecher in einer Rede 1997)
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
