Hi Bram,

2016/9/22 Thu 2:37:29 UTC+9 Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> Christian Brabandt wrote:
> 
> > Am 2016-09-21 00:00, schrieb Ken Takata:
> > > Hi Christian,
> > > 
> > > 2016/9/21 Wed 5:31:26 UTC+9 Christian Brabandt wrote:
> > >> Hi,
> > >> I think I found a bug with lambda expressions.
> > >> 
> > >> I was looking into writing some automated tests and was trying to use
> > >> the new lambda expressions. However this does not work as expected:
> > >> 
> > >> Here is an example:
> > >> #v+
> > >>   let a = ['FOOBAR    "word"', 'FOOBAR    "word2"']
> > >>   let pat='^FOOBAR\s\+\zs"[^"]\+"'
> > >>   let pat2='^FOOBAR\s\+\("[^"]\+"\)'
> > >>   :echo map(copy(a), 'matchstr(v:val, g:pat)')
> > >>   -> result ['"word"', '"word2"']
> > >>   :echo map(copy(a), {val -> matchstr(val, g:pat)})
> > >>   -> BUG: result ['""', '""'], expected ['"word"', '"word2"']
> > >>   :echo map(copy(a), 'substitute(v:val, g:pat2, 
> > >> ''\=submatch(1)'',"")')
> > >>   -> result ['"word"', '"word2"']
> > >>   :echo map(copy(a), {val -> substitute(val, g:pat2, '\=submatch(1)', 
> > >> '')})
> > >>   -> BUG: result ['0', '1'], expected ['"word", '"word2"']
> > >> #v-
> > > 
> > > This is not a bug. map() always passes two arguments (key and val) to 
> > > the
> > > specified Funcref. So,
> > > 
> > >>   :echo map(copy(a), {val -> matchstr(val, g:pat)})
> > > 
> > > this should be:
> > > 
> > >   :echo map(copy(a), {key, val -> matchstr(val, g:pat)})
> > > 
> > > Or you can still use v:val:
> > > 
> > >   :echo map(copy(a), {-> matchstr(v:val, g:pat)})
> > 
> > Hm, should there be an error when only one argument is given?
> > Or at least it should be more stressed in the documentatio, that two
> > arguments are expected.
> 
> How about extending the example in the help:
> 
>               If {expr2} is a |Funcref| it is called with two arguments:
>                       1. The key or the index of the current item.
>                       2. the value of the current item.
>               The function must return the new value of the item. Example
>               that changes each value by "key-value": >
>                       func KeyValue(key, val)
>                         return a:key . '-' . a:val
>                       endfunc
>                       call map(myDict, function('KeyValue'))
> <             It is shorter when using a |lambda|: >
>                       call map(myDict, {key, val -> key . '-' . val})
> <             If you do not use "val" you can leave it out: >
>                       call map(myDict, {key -> 'item: ' . key})

A similar update might be needed for `:help filter()`.

Regards,
Ken Takata

-- 
-- 
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to vim_dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Raspunde prin e-mail lui