On 2017-01-24, Christian Brabandt wrote: > Hi Bram! > > On Di, 24 Jan 2017, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > > Hmm, so when using "eventignore=all" perhaps the TermResponse should not > > be ignored? Or should we support the value "all,-TermResponse"? > > It's going to be tricky either way. > > I think it should not be ignored. If one really wants to ignore it, one > could set t_RV to an empty string.
I don't think setting t_RV to an empty string will fix the problem. If netrw wants to ignore the termresponse from the terminal, I think setting t_RV to an empty string will be too late. I think Vim has already sent t_RV when netrw is invoked. Also, triggering a TermResponse autocommand is different from setting v:termresponse, which is done even if TermResponse is ignored. Regards, Gary -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
