Christian Ludwig wrote:
> in the attachment is a proposed patch for Issue 848 for gtk3vim
> https://github.com/vim/vim/issues/848
> [written by Kazunobu Kuriyama (nuko8) and me].
>
> This issue cannot be seen at all window managers [but openbox seems to
> be a good candidate].
>
> What is changed by the patch?
> This patch changes the clearing/redrawing order if `draw_event` is
> called with more than one (dirty) rectangle.
>
> old order:
> clear for rect1; redraw rect1; clear for rect2; redraw rect2; ...
>
> new order:
> clear for rect1,rect2,...; redraw rect1,rect2,...;
>
> Why?
> There is the hypothesis that later clear-actions (e.g. clear for rect2)
> can/may remove some of the parts already drawn by former redraw-actions
> (e.g. redraw rect1).
>
> For more details, please see discussion at the issue page.
Thanks. I suppose this not only change the order, but also fixes an
off-by-one error.
--
An operatingsystem is just a name you give to the rest of bloating
idiosyncratic machine-based-features you left out of your editor.
(author unknown)
/// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\
/// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org ///
\\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org ///
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
