Tony wrote: > > > I suppose it could still be enabled by editing src/feature.h but that > > > was of little use anyhow. > > > > Yes, enabling a feature by recompiling isn't useful. And I haven't > > heard anybody talk about this for years. > > > I meant _this particular feature_ was of little use. FWIW, I > personally enable +xterm_save (and disable +tag_old_static) by editing > src/feature.h in my own builds. For other wanted or unwanted features > I found appropriate configure arguments.
Using configure is just another way to enable/disable features. And it doesn't work on MS-Windows. The +xterm_save feature is just a simple way to default the xterm t_ti and t_te entries to some values. You might as well set them in your vimrc. +tag_old_static is supposed to support old tags files, at the cost of some extra computations. I wonder how much slower it gets. It can't be much. On the other hand, there can hardly be any tags file using this format. It was only supported by a few versions of ctags. Anybody should be able to get a better version of ctags if needed. Thus maybe we can drop support for old static tags? -- hundred-and-one symptoms of being an internet addict: 101. U can read htis w/o ny porblm and cant figur eout Y its evn listd. /// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\ /// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\ \\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org /// \\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org /// -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
