Christian wrote:
> On Do, 18 Apr 2019, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
>
> > I don't like this solution, if there is an error then some part of the
> > information has gone missing.
>
> Probably true.
> >
> > A better solution would be to load the buffer in what will be the
> > current tab last.
>
> I tried that, but I fear that would require a bigger refactoring, since
> loading of the initial buffer is done earlier in command_line_scan()
>
> So how about just temporarily resetting the shm option when loading the
> other tabs. We will switch back to the initial tab in edit_buffers()
> anyhow, so why printing the fileinfo() at all?
Ok, this looks like a reasonable compromise. Let's add "F" to
'shortmess', in case one of the other flags matter.
--
CONCORDE: Message for you, sir.
He falls forward revealing the arrow with the note.
"Monty Python and the Holy Grail" PYTHON (MONTY) PICTURES LTD
/// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\
/// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org ///
\\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org ///
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
