Yegappan wrote:
> BTW, should we call this function matchfuzzy() or fuzzymatch()?
> Any preferences?
matchfuzzy() works best. When sorting the match*() functions are
together.
In the past we have not put the most important property first, which
causes related methods to be scattered. So getmatches() sorts far
away from other match functions. matchesget() might have been better,
although it doesn't sounds so good.
--
ARTHUR: No, hang on! Just answer the five questions ...
GALAHAD: Three questions ...
ARTHUR: Three questions ... And we shall watch ... and pray.
"Monty Python and the Holy Grail" PYTHON (MONTY) PICTURES LTD
/// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\
/// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org ///
\\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org ///
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/vim_dev/202009111710.08BHALB4925388%40masaka.moolenaar.net.
